After nine full years of doing the Ecoholic column in NOW Magazine, we’ve given it a bit of a facelift! Instead of just sticking to the basic Q&A style every week, we’ll be mixing and matching different elements, like our NOW Test Lab (reviewing and ranking products every week – this time, canned tuna), Nature Notes (bits of important enviro news), Greenwash of the Week (this week, bashing Starbucks so-called reusable mug) and other flexible elements. It’ll shift and shuffle, depending on the week. If you’re not getting the full effect (by seeing it in print) then be sure to scope out the various story components by clicking here. Take a look around and let me know what you think! And don’t forget to email with tips and ideas for future Ecoholic stories, greenwash of the week items, nature notes, product reviews, you name it!
Bigger, better Ecoholic column gets a fresh-faced makeover!
categories:Column, Miscellaneous
0 comment
Happy Earth Week! Now’s Green Issue, being the change & more!
categories:Big Issues, Column
2 comments
This week at NOW Magazine, we put out our big green issue – beaming with positive vibes! It’s entitled Sure Signs We’re Winning the Eco War. The lovely and talented Alice Klein (my NOW publisher) wrote up the title piece, Hang On, Treehuggers. For an uplifting breakdown of our last year in eco victories, big and small, local, national and global, check out my story on the topic. If you’re still not raring to go, get a little motivational kick in the pants with my how to piece called Be the Change! It’ll tell you how to Find Your Green Tony Robbins and track down sources of inspiration (hint: go see Rob Stewart’s Revolution!), then I lay out a blueprint for the way forward, including:
CUSTOMIZE YOUR PLACE IN ACTIVISM 2.0
The idea of holding a picket sign and marching on Parliament just not doing it for you? Fear not. As storytelling activist Emily Hunter says, we need eco warriors of all shapes and stripes, so just get creative with the skills you have.
Your mission this week, should you choose to accept it, is to pick one thing
that gets your green goat, then follow this simple participaction blueprint. 1) Start a conversation about it; 2) brainstorm how you can push your issue forward with your earth-given skills; and 3) don’t forget to invite the world.
Amplify your Activist 2.0 voice with one easy click by plugging in to the web of interconnectivity that unites the planet: post your mission on Facebook, Twitter, Instragram or LinkedIn. And don’t forget change.org, where you still have outstanding homework – to start your own petition.
I also talk about more ways to, as Annie Leonard says, Flex Your Citizen Muscles as well as the importance of Loving Your Eco Skeptic Neighbour and transforming the way we engage with each other.
There’s only so much that can be accomplished when we’re focused on loathing everyone who isn’t on “our side.”
Read the whole story here.
Happy Earth Week, everyone!
Thanks to Simran Sethi, Emily Hunter, Rob Stewart, Annie Leonard and beyond for inspiration for this week’s piece.
This week at NOW Magazine, we put out our big green issue – beaming with positive vibes! It’s entitled Sure Signs We’re Winning the Eco War. The lovely and talented Alice Klein (my NOW publisher) wrote up the title piece, Hang On, Treehuggers. For an uplifting breakdown of our last year in eco victories, big and small, local, national and global, check out my story on the topic. If you’re still not raring to go, get a little motivational kick in the pants with my how to piece called Be the Change! It’ll tell you how to Find Your Green Tony Robbins and track down sources of inspiration (hint: go see Rob Stewart’s Revolution!), then I lay out a blueprint for the way forward, including:
CUSTOMIZE YOUR PLACE IN ACTIVISM 2.0
The idea of holding a picket sign and marching on Parliament just not doing it for you? Fear not. As storytelling activist Emily Hunter says, we need eco warriors of all shapes and stripes, so just get creative with the skills you have.
Your mission this week, should you choose to accept it, is to pick one thing
that gets your green goat, then follow this simple participaction blueprint. 1) Start a conversation about it; 2) brainstorm how you can push your issue forward with your earth-given skills; and 3) don’t forget to invite the world.
Amplify your Activist 2.0 voice with one easy click by plugging in to the web of interconnectivity that unites the planet: post your mission on Facebook, Twitter, Instragram or LinkedIn. And don’t forget change.org, where you still have outstanding homework – to start your own petition.
I also talk about more ways to, as Annie Leonard says, Flex Your Citizen Muscles as well as the importance of Loving Your Eco Skeptic Neighbour and transforming the way we engage with each other.
There’s only so much that can be accomplished when we’re focused on loathing everyone who isn’t on “our side.”
Read the whole story here.
Happy Earth Week, everyone!
Thanks to Simran Sethi, Emily Hunter, Rob Stewart, Annie Leonard and beyond for inspiration for this week’s piece.
Natural vs green: what does it really mean?
After a lunch time talk I gave at Edmonton’s city hall last month, one woman approached me and asked me if I could spend more time talking about the difference between green/eco-friendly and natural. The terms, she said, were too often used interchangeably, and she’s right. We tend to flip back and forth between the two as though they’re twins, but that isn’t always the case. Sometimes there are gaping distances between them (more like Danny Devito and Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Twins). So I clarified the issue in this week’s Ecoholic column. To dive into the details, read more here.
You know I love to call out companies that claim they’re natural, claim they’re green but are really just full of BS. What of companies that can honestly claim to be both, to some degree? I had a lengthy conversation with a chemist at Nature Clean, one of Canada’s oldest ‘natural/naturally-derived,’ ‘nontoxic,’ ‘biodegradable’ cleaning companies, certified by EcoLogo. I’ve given good reviews to their Tub and Tile cream and all purpose cleaner, but started getting agitated by the fact that it contained a palm-derived ingredient. Natural, yes? But green? Well, not so much. I’ve been itching to know why they’d use palm-derived fatty polyglycoside when palm is such a controversial ingredient plagued by sustainability woes (hence why it’s on my Ecoholic Body Mean 15 list). So I gave Nature Clean a call and ended up in a surprisingly open, frank dialogue on green versus natural with their chemist Martin Vince.
Martin first tells me their palm ingredient is fully certified via the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. I know the RSPO is the only sustainable palm certifier out there and is the only organized attempt at greening the industry, but the RSPO has faced a lot of flack for letting violations slide, I point out. Martin responds, “We know the Roundtable is not the ideal situation, but it’s better than not having it.” Why not avoid the ingredient altogether then? “We are actively looking for alternatives. We’re looking at grapeseed derived surfactants, but they’re not suitable for cleaning products currently. Alkyl polyglucosides are one of very few surfactants that are 100% natural (palm oil mixed with dextrose). Most are hybrids like alcohol ethoxylates, which has chances of contamination with [carcinogenic] 1-4 dioxane. We’ve chosen the purest we can currently use. And we do need surfactants because that’s what does the cleaning.”
What do you think? I know Martin’s right when he says says that replacement ingredients aren’t without impact either. Coconut plantations (like all monoculture crops) also encroach on natural habitat and basic table salt (used in natural cleaners) can certainly be ecologically disruptive to mine. Everything we buy has an impact somewhere, whether we’ve taken it from nature or concoct it in a lab, but let’s agree some are worse than others.
I’ve got to admit that at least Nature Clean has put itself out there more than other “green/natural” cleaners who refuse to list their full ingredients and simply offer up vague terms like “plant-based surfactants” or, in the case of Eco-Mist, “potatoes, corn, grains” (come on, that’s a recipe for stew not a clear, watery cleaner). Ultimately, as consumers, we’ve got to keep reminding companies that we’re watching and that yes, we want it all. Not everything we buy will be totally green (in its many senses of the word) and natural, but we’ve to push them and ourselves to come close.
After a lunch time talk I gave at Edmonton’s city hall last month, one woman approached me and asked me if I could spend more time talking about the difference between green/eco-friendly and natural. The terms, she said, were too often used interchangeably, and she’s right. We tend to flip back and forth between the two as though they’re twins, but that isn’t always the case. Sometimes there are gaping distances between them (more like Danny Devito and Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Twins). So I clarified the issue in this week’s Ecoholic column. To dive into the details, read more here.
You know I love to call out companies that claim they’re natural, claim they’re green but are really just full of BS. What of companies that can honestly claim to be both, to some degree? I had a lengthy conversation with a chemist at Nature Clean, one of Canada’s oldest ‘natural/naturally-derived,’ ‘nontoxic,’ ‘biodegradable’ cleaning companies, certified by EcoLogo. I’ve given good reviews to their Tub and Tile cream and all purpose cleaner, but started getting agitated by the fact that it contained a palm-derived ingredient. Natural, yes? But green? Well, not so much. I’ve been itching to know why they’d use palm-derived fatty polyglycoside when palm is such a controversial ingredient plagued by sustainability woes (hence why it’s on my Ecoholic Body Mean 15 list). So I gave Nature Clean a call and ended up in a surprisingly open, frank dialogue on green versus natural with their chemist Martin Vince.
Martin first tells me their palm ingredient is fully certified via the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. I know the RSPO is the only sustainable palm certifier out there and is the only organized attempt at greening the industry, but the RSPO has faced a lot of flack for letting violations slide, I point out. Martin responds, “We know the Roundtable is not the ideal situation, but it’s better than not having it.” Why not avoid the ingredient altogether then? “We are actively looking for alternatives. We’re looking at grapeseed derived surfactants, but they’re not suitable for cleaning products currently. Alkyl polyglucosides are one of very few surfactants that are 100% natural (palm oil mixed with dextrose). Most are hybrids like alcohol ethoxylates, which has chances of contamination with [carcinogenic] 1-4 dioxane. We’ve chosen the purest we can currently use. And we do need surfactants because that’s what does the cleaning.”
What do you think? I know Martin’s right when he says says that replacement ingredients aren’t without impact either. Coconut plantations (like all monoculture crops) also encroach on natural habitat and basic table salt (used in natural cleaners) can certainly be ecologically disruptive to mine. Everything we buy has an impact somewhere, whether we’ve taken it from nature or concoct it in a lab, but let’s agree some are worse than others.
I’ve got to admit that at least Nature Clean has put itself out there more than other “green/natural” cleaners who refuse to list their full ingredients and simply offer up vague terms like “plant-based surfactants” or, in the case of Eco-Mist, “potatoes, corn, grains” (come on, that’s a recipe for stew not a clear, watery cleaner). Ultimately, as consumers, we’ve got to keep reminding companies that we’re watching and that yes, we want it all. Not everything we buy will be totally green (in its many senses of the word) and natural, but we’ve to push them and ourselves to come close.
No fracking way: keep your furnace (and water) off dirty gas
categories:Big Issues, Column, Home
Comments Off
How’d you get your eggs cooked this morning…or your shower nice and hot? Natural gas has always gotten a lot more respect on the green-front than other fossil fuels. We hear again and again that it burns cleaner, choking out less smoggy pollutants than say coal or conventional oil, so when we use it in our homes we don’t feel so guilty. We get 1 green thumb up for our natural gas furnaces (particularly if they’re high efficiency), natural gas-fired baths (especially if your system is tankless or high efficiency), even our our natural gas stoves (as a cook, I admit, I love mine). But I would feel a lot dirtier coming of that shower if that natural gas had been fracked, as it is in a growing number of provinces and states. I get into all the nitty gritty in the latest Ecoholic column on natural gas and fracking.
The Artis
ts Against Fracking video above is trying to keep fracking out of NY state but the message extends across state lines. Tell your provincial/state politicians not to frack with you – keep the hydraulic fracturing of natural gas out of our energy plans. Sign this Don’t Frack With Our Water Petition from the Council of Canadians.
How’d you get your eggs cooked this morning…or your shower nice and hot? Natural gas has always gotten a lot more respect on the green-front than other fossil fuels. We hear again and again that it burns cleaner, choking out less smoggy pollutants than say coal or conventional oil, so when we use it in our homes we don’t feel so guilty. We get 1 green thumb up for our natural gas furnaces (particularly if they’re high efficiency), natural gas-fired baths (especially if your system is tankless or high efficiency), even our our natural gas stoves (as a cook, I admit, I love mine). But I would feel a lot dirtier coming of that shower if that natural gas had been fracked, as it is in a growing number of provinces and states. I get into all the nitty gritty in the latest Ecoholic column on natural gas and fracking.
The Artis
ts Against Fracking video above is trying to keep fracking out of NY state but the message extends across state lines. Tell your provincial/state politicians not to frack with you – keep the hydraulic fracturing of natural gas out of our energy plans. Sign this Don’t Frack With Our Water Petition from the Council of Canadians.
What’s hiding in your wipes?
I know, I know, wipes are seriously convenient when you’re on the go, but you probably know it’s definitely more sustainable to go the reusable cloth/wipe/rag route. You wipe junkies will have my head if I tell you to axe them from your life permanently, but can we agree to reducing? Let’s try a tradeoff. Cut out disposable wipes from your cleaning routine and home bodycare routine (that means NO using moist wipes instead of TP!) and keep the disposables for when you’re out and about. For the DIY route, an old flannel sheet cut up into squares works beautifully. Now what to look for when you’re shopping for greener wipes? Read the latest Ecoholic column on the topic! Here are a few bonus bits of info.
Rash-worthy ingredients
The thing with wipes is the chemical substances aren’t rinsed off, they get to stay on skin. Not good since so many wipes contain stuff like parabens and serious irritants. Also, just because the wipe says it’s natural, doesn’t mean it’s free of dodgy chemicals. Huggies Naturals wipes replaced formaldehyde- releasing DMDM hydantoin with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone. Not good! Dermatology journals have documented cases of sores, redness and itching on people’s behinds, hands, etc from using moist wipes that contain the preservatives (these bad boys are so irritating they’re on Health Canada’s hotlist of restricted ingredients).
Phenoxyethanol, while really common in paraben-free products like Aleva, can also trigger skin reactions with prolonged contact in some so isn’t desirable in products that stay on the skin. Ditto for cocamidopropyl betaine, which may really irritate some (like my mom!). FYI, phenoxyethanol used to be okayed by some organic certifiers like Ecocert, but Ecocert has since changed its mind.
Don’t believe the biodegradable hype
I’m glad there are so many wipes out there that are offering alternatives to typical petroleum-fibre materials (like polyester, etc), but be aware that if your wipes say they’re made of tree pulp or cellulose fibre, they’re mostly just rayon AKA viscose – yes, your wipes, too. Rayon/viscose fibre is made of tree pulp aka cellulose fibre and, as I say in the column, the Federal Trade Commission cracked down on bamboo rayon companies claiming their materials were biodegradable because, well, nothing biodegrades in your typical North American landfill – and city composters just skims all wipes out. Also processing tree pulp, even bamboo, into a soft fabric like rayon involves a lot of polluting chems. All this to say, your wipes really not going to biodegrade, so let’s try to use less of them. Deal?
I know, I know, wipes are seriously convenient when you’re on the go, but you probably know it’s definitely more sustainable to go the reusable cloth/wipe/rag route. You wipe junkies will have my head if I tell you to axe them from your life permanently, but can we agree to reducing? Let’s try a tradeoff. Cut out disposable wipes from your cleaning routine and home bodycare routine (that means NO using moist wipes instead of TP!) and keep the disposables for when you’re out and about. For the DIY route, an old flannel sheet cut up into squares works beautifully. Now what to look for when you’re shopping for greener wipes? Read the latest Ecoholic column on the topic! Here are a few bonus bits of info.
Rash-worthy ingredients
The thing with wipes is the chemical substances aren’t rinsed off, they get to stay on skin. Not good since so many wipes contain stuff like parabens and serious irritants. Also, just because the wipe says it’s natural, doesn’t mean it’s free of dodgy chemicals. Huggies Naturals wipes replaced formaldehyde- releasing DMDM hydantoin with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone. Not good! Dermatology journals have documented cases of sores, redness and itching on people’s behinds, hands, etc from using moist wipes that contain the preservatives (these bad boys are so irritating they’re on Health Canada’s hotlist of restricted ingredients).
Phenoxyethanol, while really common in paraben-free products like Aleva, can also trigger skin reactions with prolonged contact in some so isn’t desirable in products that stay on the skin. Ditto for cocamidopropyl betaine, which may really irritate some (like my mom!). FYI, phenoxyethanol used to be okayed by some organic certifiers like Ecocert, but Ecocert has since changed its mind.
Don’t believe the biodegradable hype
I’m glad there are so many wipes out there that are offering alternatives to typical petroleum-fibre materials (like polyester, etc), but be aware that if your wipes say they’re made of tree pulp or cellulose fibre, they’re mostly just rayon AKA viscose – yes, your wipes, too. Rayon/viscose fibre is made of tree pulp aka cellulose fibre and, as I say in the column, the Federal Trade Commission cracked down on bamboo rayon companies claiming their materials were biodegradable because, well, nothing biodegrades in your typical North American landfill – and city composters just skims all wipes out. Also processing tree pulp, even bamboo, into a soft fabric like rayon involves a lot of polluting chems. All this to say, your wipes really not going to biodegrade, so let’s try to use less of them. Deal?
Clothing is the new meth? The toxic cocktail in your closet
Ever wonder what that smell is on your new clothes? It could be one of countless chemical substances used in the making of shirts, pants, outwear, you name it. Not all the hazardous compounds involved will give off a scent or trigger reactions but they are definitely making the workers who make our clothes and the rivers surrounding them sick. To find out what’s lurking in your closet and which clothing companies have vowed to #Detox their brands by 2020, you’ll want to check out this Ecoholic column. PS if you’ve got chemical sensitivities, you need to take extra precautions. Here’s a column I did a little while back on clothing for those with multiple chemical sensitivities.
Ever wonder what that smell is on your new clothes? It could be one of countless chemical substances used in the making of shirts, pants, outwear, you name it. Not all the hazardous compounds involved will give off a scent or trigger reactions but they are definitely making the workers who make our clothes and the rivers surrounding them sick. To find out what’s lurking in your closet and which clothing companies have vowed to #Detox their brands by 2020, you’ll want to check out this Ecoholic column. PS if you’ve got chemical sensitivities, you need to take extra precautions. Here’s a column I did a little while back on clothing for those with multiple chemical sensitivities.
How close is too close? The ins and outs of cell phone safety
categories:Column, Health, Miscellaneous
Comments Off
Wondering about cell phone safety and whether it’s worth looking for a phone lower in radiation? The answer is complicated…and may surprise you. Check it out the column in Ecoholic.
Wondering about cell phone safety and whether it’s worth looking for a phone lower in radiation? The answer is complicated…and may surprise you. Check it out the column in Ecoholic.
The scoop on petroleum jelly
This one’s for all the baby mama, baby daddy and all the other petroleum jelly users out there. Is it safe? Is it sustainable? What should you replace it with? You’ll find the full scoop in the latest Ecoholic column right here.
This one’s for all the baby mama, baby daddy and all the other petroleum jelly users out there. Is it safe? Is it sustainable? What should you replace it with? You’ll find the full scoop in the latest Ecoholic column right here.
Lashing out at faked mascara ads
Can someone tell me, when did mascara companies start promising Betty Boop lashes with every stroke? Makeup ads have always pushed jumbo lashes, true, but sometime over the last few years, we’ve started seeing eyelashes on steroids. Like if your lashes don’t look as though they were sliced off the back of a glossy mink and glued to your lids, you’re not a real woman.
No wonder I hear more women whispering about their secret desires to dye/glue/perm their lashes and lash bars keep sprouting up around town. Our cultural swell in ‘great lash’ inadequacy (I know, I’ve had it too) is really just the latest in airbrush-driven insecurities fuelling the rise of the female toxic body burden.
Over the last couple years, the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority has actually smacked down Rimmel and, this past fall, banned a Dior ad because they were applying their mascara to fake lashes. Talk about false advertising. The ASA has also pulled an overly airbrushed foundation ad, anti-wrinkle cream ad and more for similar reasons. Alas, the same ‘bullshit in advertising standards’ have not been applied to most North American glossy mags. Mostly, because here in Canada we have a complaint-driven system and not enough of us have been officially complaining. Though last summer a 14-year old in the U.S. did manage to start a change.org petition that convinced Seventeen magazine to stop with its incessant airbrushing, already.
If these faked, glammed up images just fed our insecurities in order to drive a product’s sales, it would be one thing. But they’re mostly selling products that pump more harmful chemicals into our already overloaded bodies. And when our expectations are so artificially jacked from floating in a sea of unfair images, lots of women will try a natural mascara and say, “Meh, not enough ‘wow factor, sorry.’” I know, I hear it from my friends all the time – especially on the mascara front. When the visual cues we get from ads are so far off from every day realities, hell yeah, a lot of women feel the heat and reach for the big guns – not just mascara that promises false lash effects or 12-hour lipsticks but lash extensions, the lash lifts, the list goes on.
I’m no judge. I’ve been a sucker for some of these promises, too. A newly packaged tube of Organic Wear Natural Lash Boosting Mascara lured me in by promising that”100% saw thicker & longer looking lashes instantly! 94% saw extended & fuller looking lashes after 4 weeks!”
Wow, was this actually a natural lash grower not to feel guilty about? Of course, standing amid ‘Colossal’ ‘Volum Express Falsies Flared’TM wands of ‘Illegal Lengths’ I wanted to ignore the small disclaimer on the box that confessed the stats had, well, no clinical validity: “*Based on individual perception of results of a panel of women wearing Organic Wear Lash Boosting Mascara.”
Based on individual perception. Right.
I’m not telling you to give up makeup. I wear it pretty much every day. I’m just saying let’s all raise our middle fingers towards Madison Avenue – and their false lash effects. We don’t need the added hormone disruptors and ecosystem toxins their drugstore psychology is trying to sell us. Then put your fingers down and take a second look at some of the genuinely natural makeup brands on the market that do a hell of job working with naturally-derived ingredients. I mention some of my favourites in the latest Ecoholic column and even more in Ecoholic Body. You might have to bend just a little on the lash-boosting power but I promise they’ll enhance what nature gave you and deliver way more feel-good factor for your buck.
Oh, and if you want to complain about an ad’s unfair or deceptive advertising tactics, don’t be shy. Call the Competition Bureau: 1-800-348-5358 or fill out an online complaint form here. And get your friends to do the same. All it takes is half a dozen people complaining about the same thing to have an official investigation launched.
First published in nowtoronto.com
Can someone tell me, when did mascara companies start promising Betty Boop lashes with every stroke? Makeup ads have always pushed jumbo lashes, true, but sometime over the last few years, we’ve started seeing eyelashes on steroids. Like if your lashes don’t look as though they were sliced off the back of a glossy mink and glued to your lids, you’re not a real woman.
No wonder I hear more women whispering about their secret desires to dye/glue/perm their lashes and lash bars keep sprouting up around town. Our cultural swell in ‘great lash’ inadequacy (I know, I’ve had it too) is really just the latest in airbrush-driven insecurities fuelling the rise of the female toxic body burden.
Over the last couple years, the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority has actually smacked down Rimmel and, this past fall, banned a Dior ad because they were applying their mascara to fake lashes. Talk about false advertising. The ASA has also pulled an overly airbrushed foundation ad, anti-wrinkle cream ad and more for similar reasons. Alas, the same ‘bullshit in advertising standards’ have not been applied to most North American glossy mags. Mostly, because here in Canada we have a complaint-driven system and not enough of us have been officially complaining. Though last summer a 14-year old in the U.S. did manage to start a change.org petition that convinced Seventeen magazine to stop with its incessant airbrushing, already.
If these faked, glammed up images just fed our insecurities in order to drive a product’s sales, it would be one thing. But they’re mostly selling products that pump more harmful chemicals into our already overloaded bodies. And when our expectations are so artificially jacked from floating in a sea of unfair images, lots of women will try a natural mascara and say, “Meh, not enough ‘wow factor, sorry.’” I know, I hear it from my friends all the time – especially on the mascara front. When the visual cues we get from ads are so far off from every day realities, hell yeah, a lot of women feel the heat and reach for the big guns – not just mascara that promises false lash effects or 12-hour lipsticks but lash extensions, the lash lifts, the list goes on.
I’m no judge. I’ve been a sucker for some of these promises, too. A newly packaged tube of Organic Wear Natural Lash Boosting Mascara lured me in by promising that”100% saw thicker & longer looking lashes instantly! 94% saw extended & fuller looking lashes after 4 weeks!”
Wow, was this actually a natural lash grower not to feel guilty about? Of course, standing amid ‘Colossal’ ‘Volum Express Falsies Flared’TM wands of ‘Illegal Lengths’ I wanted to ignore the small disclaimer on the box that confessed the stats had, well, no clinical validity: “*Based on individual perception of results of a panel of women wearing Organic Wear Lash Boosting Mascara.”
Based on individual perception. Right.
I’m not telling you to give up makeup. I wear it pretty much every day. I’m just saying let’s all raise our middle fingers towards Madison Avenue – and their false lash effects. We don’t need the added hormone disruptors and ecosystem toxins their drugstore psychology is trying to sell us. Then put your fingers down and take a second look at some of the genuinely natural makeup brands on the market that do a hell of job working with naturally-derived ingredients. I mention some of my favourites in the latest Ecoholic column and even more in Ecoholic Body. You might have to bend just a little on the lash-boosting power but I promise they’ll enhance what nature gave you and deliver way more feel-good factor for your buck.
Oh, and if you want to complain about an ad’s unfair or deceptive advertising tactics, don’t be shy. Call the Competition Bureau: 1-800-348-5358 or fill out an online complaint form here. And get your friends to do the same. All it takes is half a dozen people complaining about the same thing to have an official investigation launched.
First published in nowtoronto.com
Since we can’t live in a bubble: Tackling hormone disruptors
categories:Big Issues, Column, Health
Comments Off
Ever feel like you’ve got a lot to get off your chest? I did this week so I wrote about hormone disrupting chemicals, not once, but twice (three times if you count this blog). First, in my column covering a conference on hormone disruptors, talking about what the feds are or aren’t doing to protect us from this family of disruptive chemicals. And since that got me thinking, I wrote some more, in a blog NOW entitled Dying for Us: Considering the Women That Make Our Stuff.
It got me thinking about all the women that work with hazardous chemicals for a living, the women that make the stuff we use everyday – from the canned food and beverages we buy to the cars we sit in, the women who style our hair, do our dry cleaning or help heal us in hospitals, the women who work with cleaners, plastics, solvents, the list goes on. [James] Brophy and [Margaret] Keith found, as a whole, this highly exposed group has a 42% greater chance of getting breast cancer, and depending on where they work, that rate jumps dramatically (think women who make any of the metal goods that surround you, the women who grow the non-organic foods you may buy).
It also got me thinking about something the New York Times said, how hormone disruptors are the tobacco of our time. In truth, they’re worse since they’re so many different products from our cosmetics and our cleaners to our canned foods and our cars. And they’re making us sick in so many different ways - thyroid problems, early puberty, fertility woes, rises in breast/prostate/ testicular cancer, fibroids, endometriosis, genital birth defects, obesity, heart disease, ADHD, the list goes on. Not to mention their impacts on wildlife and biodiversity. Consider it, with climate change, the one-two punch to the planet.
And yeah, while I talk about hormone disruptors almost every week in my columns on flame retardants, bodycare, BPA, reno materials, stain proofers, you name it, and have for years now, something about the conference I went to struck a deeper cord. Having all those scientists, researchers, cancer orgs, women’s networks and workers unions in one room standing together saying, ‘listen we are in crisis, Houston, we have a problem,’ it got my attention and I hope it gets yours. These are the people on the ground looking at the data pleading to be heard by our government regulators, to be heard by corporations, to be heard by chemists, saying look, you can’t keep playing whac-a-mole, tackling one harmful hormone disruptor like BPA or PBDE flame retardants at a time. They just get replaced with other hormone disruptors. You have to take them on as a whole – something Europe is voting on the coming weeks.
I’m going to keep talking about how to minimize the toxins in our lives, sharing tips with you on how to be smart shoppers and how to avoid the chemical minefield out there. But it can’t all fall on us, the people doing the shopping. That still leaves the majority of Canadians swallowing estrogen-mimickers like BPA and exposes the women and men making our stuff to illnesses that shouldn’t come with your paycheque.
So please, tell your politicians elected to represent you that it’s time to deal with hormone disruptors head on. In the meantime, we all have to press for safe chems where we work, safe cleaners in our schools, safe products on shelves – because, despite the rumours, we can’t really quarantine ourselves with bubble wrap.
Ever feel like you’ve got a lot to get off your chest? I did this week so I wrote about hormone disrupting chemicals, not once, but twice (three times if you count this blog). First, in my column covering a conference on hormone disruptors, talking about what the feds are or aren’t doing to protect us from this family of disruptive chemicals. And since that got me thinking, I wrote some more, in a blog NOW entitled Dying for Us: Considering the Women That Make Our Stuff.
It got me thinking about all the women that work with hazardous chemicals for a living, the women that make the stuff we use everyday – from the canned food and beverages we buy to the cars we sit in, the women who style our hair, do our dry cleaning or help heal us in hospitals, the women who work with cleaners, plastics, solvents, the list goes on. [James] Brophy and [Margaret] Keith found, as a whole, this highly exposed group has a 42% greater chance of getting breast cancer, and depending on where they work, that rate jumps dramatically (think women who make any of the metal goods that surround you, the women who grow the non-organic foods you may buy).
It also got me thinking about something the New York Times said, how hormone disruptors are the tobacco of our time. In truth, they’re worse since they’re so many different products from our cosmetics and our cleaners to our canned foods and our cars. And they’re making us sick in so many different ways - thyroid problems, early puberty, fertility woes, rises in breast/prostate/ testicular cancer, fibroids, endometriosis, genital birth defects, obesity, heart disease, ADHD, the list goes on. Not to mention their impacts on wildlife and biodiversity. Consider it, with climate change, the one-two punch to the planet.
And yeah, while I talk about hormone disruptors almost every week in my columns on flame retardants, bodycare, BPA, reno materials, stain proofers, you name it, and have for years now, something about the conference I went to struck a deeper cord. Having all those scientists, researchers, cancer orgs, women’s networks and workers unions in one room standing together saying, ‘listen we are in crisis, Houston, we have a problem,’ it got my attention and I hope it gets yours. These are the people on the ground looking at the data pleading to be heard by our government regulators, to be heard by corporations, to be heard by chemists, saying look, you can’t keep playing whac-a-mole, tackling one harmful hormone disruptor like BPA or PBDE flame retardants at a time. They just get replaced with other hormone disruptors. You have to take them on as a whole – something Europe is voting on the coming weeks.
I’m going to keep talking about how to minimize the toxins in our lives, sharing tips with you on how to be smart shoppers and how to avoid the chemical minefield out there. But it can’t all fall on us, the people doing the shopping. That still leaves the majority of Canadians swallowing estrogen-mimickers like BPA and exposes the women and men making our stuff to illnesses that shouldn’t come with your paycheque.
So please, tell your politicians elected to represent you that it’s time to deal with hormone disruptors head on. In the meantime, we all have to press for safe chems where we work, safe cleaners in our schools, safe products on shelves – because, despite the rumours, we can’t really quarantine ourselves with bubble wrap.








